Patrick Baylis, Severin Borenstein, and Ed Rubin “When We Change the Clock, Does the Clock Change Us?” (March 2023) | WP-335 | Blog Post

Standardized time is a central device for coordinating activities and economic behavior across individuals. Time zones synchronize activities across large geographic areas, while daylight saving time coordinates a shift in clocks across a society, originally with the intent of reducing energy usage. However, there is nearly always conflict between an individual’s goals of coordinating activities with others and engaging in those activities at their own preferred time. When time is standardized across large geographic areas, that tension is enhanced, because norms about the “clock times” of activities conflict with adapting to local environmental conditions created by natural or “solar” time. This tension is at the heart of current state and national debates about adopting daylight saving time or switching time zones.

We study this conflict by examining how geographic and temporal variation in solar time affects the timing of a range of common behaviors in the United States. Specifically, we estimate the degree to which people shift their online behavior (through Twitter), their commute (using data from the Census), and their visits to businesses and other establishments (using foot traffic data). We find that, on average, a one-hour shift in the differential between solar time and clock time—approximately the width of a time zone—leads to shifting the clock time of behavior by between 9 and 26 minutes. This result shows that while adapting to local environmental factors significantly offsets the differential between solar time and clock time, the behavioral nudge and coordination value of clock time has the larger influence on activity. We also examine how this trade-off differs across different activities and population demographics.